• From: "Steve Robertson" <stever@o...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 16:34:27 +0100

I've been authoring some DTDs, and I am growing to like them!
(An aquired taste?)

One thing missing from the syntax of ATTLIST declarations is support for
comments. This would have provided helpful clues if updating old schemas at
some time in the future.

Has this been a case of simplicity being given preference over readiblity
(!),
Or is there an historical reason behind the lack of such provisions?

Steve Robertson.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Comments within DTDs
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Handling unknown elements?
• Next by Date: Re: Comments within DTDs
• Previous by thread: Handling unknown elements?
• Next by thread: Re: Comments within DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread