• From: "John Wilson" <tug@w...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 14:26:56 +0100

Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>> and this should be implemented in the JAR file manifest.
>

>That's perhaps not the best way, since it is so Java-specific.


Yes, though none of this would preclude adding explicit version enquiry
methods to the SAX interface.

Consider this as a proposal for how the Java version might be packaged. Java
parsers could safely use java.lang.Package.isCompatibleWith()  as they
_know_ that they are written in Java and are talking to a Java package.

John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
5 Market Hill, Whitchurch, Aylesbury, Bucks HP22 4JB, UK
+44 1296 641072, +44 976 611010(mobile), +44 1296 641874(fax)
Mailto: tug@w...



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Advice on XML editor development
• Next by Date: RE: Advice on XML editor development
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX 1.0beta
• Next by thread: Advice on XML editor development
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread