• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: Xml-Dev List <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 11:48:33 +0700

David Megginson wrote:
> 
> Here's another last-minute SAX question.
> 
> I have avoided providing information about the XML declaration,
> considering it strictly a lexical matter; however, since we are
> allowing applications to do their own entity resolution, should they
> have access to the value of the 'standalone' pseudo-attribute (if
> specified)?

Definitely not.  In my view the whole idea of having resolveEntity
return null to prevent inclusion of entities is a bad one.  There needs
to be better control over entity inclusion in SAX, but this is not an
effective way to provide it.

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX: XML Declaration
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• References:
  • SAX: XML Declaration
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: SAX: 1998-04-18 pre-release
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: String Internalisation and a CORBA/DCOM Question
• Previous by thread: SAX: XML Declaration
• Next by thread: Re: SAX: XML Declaration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread