Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jon, >I'm not at liberty to disclose the details of the XSL WG's current >design work. All I'm telling you is that you are not going to get a >very accurate idea of what XSL is capable of doing based on last >year's submission. You will get a much better picture in July. Let me first say that I do understand why details of XSL WG can not be disclosed. However, I have heard through the grapevine that there is a lot of XSL development activities at Microsoft with at least one project close to completion. My concern is this: are WG members allowed to share the details of WG activity with coworkers? If so, Microsoft and other members of the WG will have had 1 full year of lead time when the rest of us can see the next version of XSL spec. It is true that I have not contributed a dime to W3C while Microsoft and others have contributed significantly. What I am saying is this: closed WG like XSL WG should release interim specs more frequently (i.e. 3 months). I believe I have some probability of competing with a small MS team even if they were given 3 months of lead time (after all I do have the strength of ten men and can leap over reasonably tall structures after a good meal ;-). I do not believe I can if they have one year of lead time. Regards, Don Park http://www.docuverse.com/personal/index.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
