[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Peter Murray-Rust wrote: > it. IMO the single most important thing about XML is that it makes things > accessible to at least a hundred times more people than other technologies. I couldn't agree more. Why do you think the Web was so widely and swiftly adopted? Because you could such neat things with it *and the price of admission was low*. That is, HTML is definitely not rocket science. Let's try to see if we can keep XML from being rocket science. For example, why can't we use XML Data for our DTDs? Why can't we use it to describe resources instead of the "labeled directed graphs" (say what?) of RDF? Sometimes the best solution is NOT the most thorough or general one, but the simplest. Roy Tennant xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



