• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 12:45:29 +0700

Juergen Modre wrote:

> Where the setStandalone _overrides_ the setting in the xml-document
> itself, _if_ set.
> If _not_ set
> a.) standalone setting in the xml document itself
>     -> use this setting
> b.) no standalone setting in the xml document itself
>     -> defaults to the default setting of
>        the parser (= to 'no' like 2.9 in the XML spec says).

The only problem I see with that is that this would make it difficult to
have a getStandalone() method.

I would prefer a setStandalone(int) with values:

static final int STANDALONE_DOCUMENT = -1;
static final int STANDALONE_NO = 0;
static final int STANDALONE_YES = 1;

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX: finalising org.sax.xml.Parser
    • From: Juergen Modre <jmodre@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Reliable endpoints for XML docs (and doclets)
• Next by Date: XP 0.2 released
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: finalising org.sax.xml.Parser
• Next by thread: XLogo: Why Logo meta program with XML ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread