[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
  • To: "xml-dev Mailing List" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 10:09:28 -0000

>  package org.xml.sax;
>
>  public interface NameList {
>    public abstract int getLength ();
>    public abstract int getIndex (String name);
>    public abstract String getName (int index);
>  }
>
>  public interface AttributeList extends NameList {
>    public abstract String getType (int index);
>    public abstract String getValue (int index);
>  }

1. Please could we retain the convenient
public String getValue (String name);

2. I thought the consensus was that getType should return an integer,
possibly a bit-significant set of flags?
>
>For notations...
>Unparsed entities...

At present this all leaves me rather cold because no-one has yet convinced
me of the value of using these XML facilities versus simple
application-level conventions like <IMAGE FILE="abc.jpeg"/>. I'm open to
persuasion; but if we need to provide these things, we must make sure they
do not add overhead for users who don't think they need to use them.

Mike Kay


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member