[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
  • To: "Jeremie Miller" <jeremie@n...>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:08:42 -0500

Jeremie Miller writes:

 > I'm wondering what everyone else thinks about this issue.  When a
 > server-side solution is used to dynamically modify XML content into HTML so
 > existing browsers can render it appropriately, what happens to a browser
 > that _can_ deal with the XML or XML + XSL?  Or what happens to an
 > intelligent spider that understands XML?  As far as I can tell, right now
 > nothing happens, they get HTML just like anyone else.  But so much is lost
 > and it nullifies much of the power of XML and the meta information it
 > contains.

This should not really be a problem -- the link for the rendered HTML
will be different (it will point to a CGI or servlet, usually), while
there can be a direct link to the XML if someone wants to make it
available.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117@f...
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins@m...
      http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member