• From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 20:13:10 -0500

Sean Mc Grath writes:

 > Annex G of the SGML handbook just says the order is insignificant. However,
 > nsgmls ESIS supplies then in declaration order and I for one have written
 > apps that relied on that. Perhaps writing apps that rely on a specific
 > order of attribute event arrival is just plain bad design!

The order of attributes should never be significant (how would you
deal with defaulted attribute values?) -- perhaps making this point
explicit would be a good minor change for the PR (Tim?).

 > Anyway, the dictionary approach, supplying all the attributes in one go
 > side-steps buffering and state space for simple little SAX apps. that want
 > to pick
 > up attributes X and Y of element Z and nothing else.
 > 
 > While on this subject, what comes first, a start-tag event or its attribute
 > event(s)?

I prefer to put the attributes first, so that all the information will
have been delivered by the time the startElement event arrives.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117@f...
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins@m...
      http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX: Attributes
    • From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX: Comments (question 7 of 10)
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: Comments (question 7 of 10)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: Attributes
• Next by thread: SAX: Status Report
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread