Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Megginson wrote [10:39 AM 1/3/98 ]: >I should clarify: the SAX interfaces and the XmlAppBase base class >will be written only once for each programming language, and they will >live in their own package (in languages that use packages). >XmlAppBase will depend only on the interfaces for information -- in >other words, there will be no such thing as a SAX-implementing parser >without the base class (parser writers need not be concerned with the >base class at all). Ahh. I was assuming that we were aiming to be able to have the SAX Client and SAX Implemention be in different languages. The practical case I'm thinking about is that I write in C++ and would like to be able to use the Java-based Implementations. Assuming a platform (for example win32) that provides interoperability at the interface level between multiple languages, or really any language-neutral IDL-based mechanism, shouldn't that be possible? I guess we should answer that question first. If we say that, yes, we want cross-language interoperability (and IDL?), then I maintain my stand. If not, I quickly retract... David ================================ David Ornstein Pragmatica, Inc. http://www.pragmaticainc.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
