Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Thanks *very* much indeed, David Personally I am very excited about the way it looks like coming together. At 22:18 04/01/98 -0500, David Megginson wrote: >Here is a preliminary status report on SAX, summarising both public >and private correspondence. This is, in fact, _very_ preliminary, >since some potential participants read e-mail only at work, and will >not even know about this thread until tomorrow (Monday) morning. To re-emphasise this. Some countries have extended holidays for GregorianYear++ and this may be their first indication that detailed feedback on SAX is requested. If you agree with the progress so far, but do not need to add anything new, let DavidM know privately. Answering the questions either publicly or privately will continue to be extremely valuable, because on some issues there may be genuine differences of opinion which cannot easily be reconciled. For example, we may need to agree that SAX is not suitable for certain processes (e.g. maintaining the master document during authoring/editing). > P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
