Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>It is essential that we have unlimited control over any namespace that >we use, and that the package name be neutral enough that those >programmers with strong allegiances to the S*n, M*******t, and >N******e armed camps all feel comfortable using it. This issue >affects only Java. Firstly, I would be personally entirely happy for it to be based on microstar.com. Without David's effort this would not be off the ground. However I know this is a potentially sensitive area and we must tackle it carefully. I agree strongly that it should be domain-name based. This requires an organisation (not just a person). Among the considerations are: - an organisation of permanency - an organisation of effective neutrality - a organisation with the trust of the community - an organisation that may (de facto) give some sort of blessing to this effort. - an organisation that does not wish to 'own' the effort. - an organisation which is not compromised by the effort. - there may be a resource implication - i.e. people will look to that org for the latest version, etc. This is a general problem and I'm sure attempts have been made to solve it already. I think that there may be non-commercial orgs who are aware of this problem (learned socs, international orgs, etc.) and > If there are people who have concerns that they wouldn't wish to post publicly, I am happy to receive them in confidence and - if necessary - to represent them anonymously. Classes ... > > com.microstar.sax.XmlParser the XML parser interface > com.microstar.sax.XmlApplication the XML application interface > com.microstar.sax.XmlAppBase the application base class, > or adaptor. > >Other possible names include "XmlProcessor" instead of "XmlParser" I am afraid that the language the spec uses is very confusing in that "processor" seems to be identical with what most people call "parser". I therefor think that "processor" should be avoided, even though it is the spec term. I also think that we should use spec terms wherever possible and refer to the spec. Thus if we have "getAttValue()" it should refer to [10] in the spec. P. Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic net connection VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
