• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David Megginson <ak117@f...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 10:14:34 -0800

At 09:57 AM 01/01/98 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>What the PR means to say here is that a DTD-driven XML parser has to
>treat whitespace in element content differently than whitespace in
>mixed content -- this, of course, has nothing to do with xml:space.
>If there is no DTD, then all element types are assumed to allow mixed
>content, so a DTD-driven XML parser ("validating XML processor") would
>report all whitespace as significant.
>
>What should SAX do with ignorable whitespace?

SAX must pass all whitespace in the document, without exception,
through to the application.  This is the only remotely conformant
behavior.  The mark-insignificant-WS stuff only is possible in
the case you're validating, and users of SAX surely do not expect
a validating-processor underneath.  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX and whitespace (was Re: Problems with whitespace and msxml)
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Problems with whitespace and msxml
• Next by Date: Validity question
• Previous by thread: XLL: NEXT/PREVIOUS vs. PSIBLING/FSIBLING
• Next by thread: Re: SAX and whitespace (was Re: Problems with whitespace and msxml)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread