• From: Sean Russell <ser@j...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 14:59:48 -0800 (PST)

[Don Park, on 29 Jan]
>  [Tim Bray]
>  >  http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-HTMLThreading-0105
>  >
>  >Now there's a cool XML application, and one that'll touch us all,
>  >if y'ask me. -Tim
>  
>  I agree.  I think we need a similar paper addressing generic data threading
>  issues.  I wonder if it is better to work on the problem of using XML to
>  solve data threading or the problem of threading XML documents?

I'm of two minds about this.  This kind of markup is useful for
document sharing and revisions, and I can see an application for it in
email.  At the risk of being considered a throw-back, I'm concerned by
the amount of bulk this kind of markup is going to add to your average
email.  Plain HTML adds a small amount of bulk, but often doesn't
increase the average email size beyond 50%.  I can see that
HTMLThreading would often more than double the size of emails.

-- 
 |..      --------------------- Sean Russell ----------------------
<|>       ser@j... <-> http://jersey.uoregon.edu/ser
/|\       ------- [           Software Engineer          ] --------
/|                [ PGP info available from my web site  ]

PGP signature

• References:
  • Re: While on the subject of W3C submissions
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Resource Description Format and XML-Data
• Next by Date: XPublish 1.0 beta (Mac XML Website Publishing)
• Previous by thread: Re: While on the subject of W3C submissions
• Next by thread: Extending DTDs for Backward Compatibility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread