• From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 14:35:27 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>
To: xml-dev@i... <xml-dev@i...>
Date: 29 January 1998 22:07
Subject: Extending DTDs for Backward Compatibility


>I need to create DTDs that are extensible...

I've got the same problem: I essentially want a "standard" DTD
for an application domain that tolerates private extensions added
by individual implementors.

I had thought of doing it with something like
 <PRIVATE TAG="mytag">XXX</PRIVATE>; this
has the advantage it flags it up as a private extension, but
it's certainly ugly in other ways. Fortunately I'm not using
attributes extensively, it's only private elements I'm really
concerned with.

Mike Kay



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Announcement: DTD generator/editor (free)
• Next by Date: Re: Extending DTDs for Backward Compatibility
• Previous by thread: Re: Extending DTDs for Backward Compatibility
• Next by thread: Re: Extending DTDs for Backward Compatibility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread