• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 11:45:49 -0800

At 01:37 PM 04/01/98 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
> > Agreed.  Could we change the first method to
> > startDocument(String root, String DTDSysID, String DTDPubID)
> > these obviously each being null in the event the document doesn't
> > provide them? -Tim
>
>This is a great idea, but it will require an implementation to queue
>events.  For example, if I have
>
>  <?foo bar?>
>  <!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "doc.dtd">
>
>I have to queue the PI event(s) until I have found the DOCTYPE

Why?  The PI is 'before' the doc in any meaningful sense... so they
get some PI events before they get the startDocument event.  Is this
a problem? -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX: Document Start and End (question 1 of 10)
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
  • Re: SAX: Document Start and End (question 1 of 10)
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: SAX: Document Start and End (question 1 of 10)
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX: Document Start and End (question 1 of 10)
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: Document Start and End (question 1 of 10)
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: Document Start and End (question 1 of 10)
• Next by thread: Re: SAX: Document Start and End (question 1 of 10)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread