Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> [paragraphs removed] > >So you have the following choice: > - encode the *whole* spec (and nothing but the spec - i.e. no tricky >non-compliant extensions) and give yourself the label "conforming XML tool". > - encode the bits you feel are cost effective and label it "processes most >XML documents, but gives 'Sorry' messages for some". More questions/issues then: A well-formed XML document is not required to have a DTD, internal or external, correct? Is a well-formed parser not an XML parser that does not have access to or does not process a DTD, internal or external? I guess I haven't found a clear definition of what a well-formed parser is yet. If this is true, then a well-formed parser doesn't even have to acknowledge that entities exist except for the built in ones, and absolutely all whitespace is preserved, right? Thanks, Jeremie Miller jer@j... http://www.jeremie.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
