• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:17:14

At 14:03 17/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
[...]
>
> > >  public void 
> > >    processingInstruction (XmlProcessor processor, String target,
String data);
>
>I disagree -- processing instructions are an essential part of a
>document (especially for architectural forms).
>

I'd tend to agree on keeping PIs in as well. Both Lark and lfred do them at
present. They are used in namespaces (which JUMBO is able to do something
with) and there are also other local uses.

	It's going great :-)

	P.

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: IDL?
• Next by Date: Re: inclusions/exclusions/named groups
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread