[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay wrote: > I don't think you're being particularly user-friendly here. The most > likely reason for a floating "]]>" is that the software-writer was > lazy and forgot to escape it. > > If we assume that most XML will be software-generated, Sure, if we make that assumption then we can make lots of "simplifications" to XML to make it harder to type and easier to generate. Then it can be as popular to end users as TeX, PDF or PostScript instead of as popular as HTML. Personally, I am not willing to make that assumption and I'm glad that the ERB did not. SGML would be just another forgotten technology if it had made that assumptions. Once we reject that assumption, the restriction on MDC is reasonable. Paul Prescod xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



