[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
do i understand the (PR-xml-971208) document correctly, that it is possible, by means of distinct document type declarations, to refer to different aspects of a document type definition? according to [31] extSubset ::= ( markupdecl | conditionalSect | PEReference | S ) there is no requirement that the external subset begin with a document type declaration. which would mean that the only indication of the root element type comes from the refering declaration. which would mean that distinct xml documents could well specify different root elements with respect to the same external subset. is this intentional? xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



