• From: digitome@i... (Sean Mc Grath)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 09:20:24 +0000

The real truth behind XML's simplicity and ease of implementaton is being badly
let down by the haziness with with parsers are classified:-

Well Formed
Valid
Type Valid (In the DOM level 1 spec.)
Tag Valid (ditto)
DTD Aware (Aelfred)

Then there is a bevvy of terminology to do with what the parsers do and do
not provide
the application
 - Comments
 - Expansion of general entities
 - Access to element type declarations

etc.
 

Given that it is on this list that most of the implementors hang out I think
we could
usefully attempt to put together a classification.

Also, from a quick reading of the DOM there does not seem to be a node type
for unexpanded
general entity. How come?

Sean Mc Grath

sean@d...
Digitome Electronic Publishing
http://www.digitome.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Classification: XML Parser Features
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: *Validating* XML Parser written in Java ?
• Next by Date: external dtd subset content
• Previous by thread: Re: Newbie Q: NXP attribute validation
• Next by thread: Classification: XML Parser Features
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread