[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: james anderson <mecom-gmbh@m...>
  • To: David Megginson <ak117@f...>, "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 16:46:22 +0100

aha!
i was missing the relation between external parsed entity and external subset.

to the drafters: a link from the discussion between [30] and [31] down to the
discussion concerning parsed entities ([78]+) would help here.
thanks.

David Megginson wrote:

> james anderson writes:
>
>  > 2? among the example DTD's we've found, some begin with an <?xml ... >
>  > form. others don't. isn't that form excluded from being a PI and thus
>  > from being a markupdecl?
>
> No, on two counts:
>
> ...

> 2) The <?xml...?> that you see at the beginning of the external subset
>    is not a processing instruction but a text declaration (which is
>    similar but not identical to an XML declaration).  For example, if
>    my external subset were encoded in ISO Latin 1, I would be required
>    to put the following declaration at the top:




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member