• From: Richard Light <richard@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 22:26:57 +0000

Hi,

I notice that the current draft has switched the case of the XML
declaration and its arguments to lower case:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

Now that case is significant, this presumably matters.  Is there a
particular reason for this?  Other PIs will have a PItarget where 'xml'
sits, and this isn't constrained to be any particular case.  Wouldn't it
be kinder to make it '<?' ('XML'|'xml') ... ?!

(The DTD declarations (<!ELEMENT, etc.) remain in upper case, presumably
for compatibility with what SGML systems produce.)

Richard.

Richard Light
SGML/XML and Museum Information Consultancy
richard@l...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: <?xml declaration
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>
  • Re: <?xml declaration
    • From: james anderson too <mecom-gmbh@m...>
  • Re: <?xml declaration
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Latest news on NXP
• Next by Date: Re: msxml 1.8 questions
• Previous by thread: Latest news on NXP
• Next by thread: Re: <?xml declaration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread