• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 01:06:54

At 17:02 11/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
[...]
>Of these, I think that only MSXML claims to be validating.  Do you
>need full validation, or do you just need a DTD-driven parser that
>will pick up entity declarations, default attribute values, etc?  We
>really need to invent some better terms, since validation and
>DTD-awareness are really separate concepts.

Terminology is really critical here and I shall address it later. If
everyone agrees on the terms half the problems will be solved. :-)

	P

Wait for the XML-based hyperglossary of XML terminology (next week)

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • *Validating* XML Parser written in Java ?
    • From: Dmitri Kondratiev <dima@p...>
  • *Validating* XML Parser written in Java ?
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: General comments on parsers
• Next by Date: RE: BUG : msxml 1.6
• Previous by thread: *Validating* XML Parser written in Java ?
• Next by thread: RE: *Validating* XML Parser written in Java ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread