Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 01:46 PM 12/28/97, Peter Murray-Rust wrote: >At 07:42 27/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote: >>In other words, a DOM builder would be just another an event-based >>SAX-J application. >This suggests that implementers of the DOM (or other tree-related >interfaces) will build on top of SAX-J. IFF you/we can persuade them of >this, then great. If not, then there might be a tendency for SAX-J to >atrophy after the DOM. There will always be applications that prefer an event-based API, and they may never want to or need to convert to a tree view. It would be nice to have a standardized event-based API in addition to the standardized tree-based API that the DOM provides... Jonathan jonathan@t... Texcel Research http://www.texcel.no xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
