• From: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@a...>
• To: "Ingo Macherius" <Ingo.Macherius@T...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 14:11:37 -0500

At 02:02 PM 12/15/97 -0500, Ingo Macherius wrote:
>
>> >      <http://www.scripting.com/siteChanges.xml>
>
>> It is not valid XML, because of 3 things:
>More exact: It is neither well-formed nor valid XML ...
> 
>> 1)  the <?XML version="1.0"> PI is missing. 
>
>Ouch. This is not well-formed at all.
>Use <?xml version="1.0"> as to the latest PR.

Note that the XML declaration PI isn't strictly required (though it's
recommended), so it's not a WF error for it to be missing.  The other
comments you made were right on.

	Eve

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: YAXPAPI (Yet Another XML Parser API)- an XDEV proposal
• Next by Date: 3 APIs ! GO FOR IT !!
• Previous by thread: LISTRIVIA (was Re: XML application)
• Next by thread: Any XSL tool!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread