• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:35:32 -0800

At 09:38 PM 16/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>After careful thought, I am fairly certain that I would be willing to
>accept the following simple event-driven API for Ælfred.  

I'd be willing to commit to signing up to do this for Lark, given
the following changes:

Oops; and I forgot the IMPORTANT one: I don't see any point in doing
this if there isn't also an ultra-simple tree interface supporting
only Element, Attribute, and Text classes.  Because this is what most
people will use, especially given that a high proportion of XML
transmissions will be small flattish documents; why should everyone
have to build their own tree. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
    • From: David Megginson <ak117@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread