• From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 14:17:55 GMT

> > >If we omit comments, then SAX-J would have to return only the
> > >following information:
> > >
> > >- elements
> > >- attributes
> > >- PIs
> > >- texts
> > 

I am wondering where XML-Devers see SAX-J relative to DPH?.
He is the guy staring at 10GB of corporate XML docs and just wants to change

<telephone>555-1234</telephone>

into

<telephone>555-4321</telepone>

throughout the whole lot. If he uses SAX-J he blows all the aide-memoires
stuffed into his comments? He also blows his CDATA marked sections. Is
the DPH destined to always use a fully blown parser to output XML?





Sean Mc Grath
sean at digitome dot com




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
    • From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>

• Prev by Date: msxml 1.8 questions
• Next by Date: Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
• Previous by thread: Job announcement: network programmer within a linguistic resource application
• Next by thread: Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread