• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 21:24:46 -0800

t 05:53 PM 02/11/97 -0800, Jon Bosak wrote:
>| Think of it as a kind of compression technique that would
>| only be enabled when both ends of the pipe can handle it.
>Empty end tags are a well formedness error, and the behavior of a
>conforming XML processor upon encountering such an error is to stop
>parsing.

Seconded.  I am flabbergasted.   In November 1997, we should be forgiving 
about well-intentioned parsers missing details of compliance with a spec 
which we keep changing, but this apparently-deliberate step out of bounds
is incomprehensible; let us assume that it is a transient error which 
will soon be rectified. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: </> as end tag
• Next by Date: Re: </> as end tag
• Previous by thread: Ampersand in URLs (was: RE: </> as end tag)
• Next by thread: RE: </> as end tag
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread