• From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:20:26 -0500

Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...> wrote:
>[...] Do we
>expect general SGML/XML repositories to be powerful enough to allow
>them to represent almost any domain-specific object model?

I don't like how I worded the question here.  Let's try again: What
sorts of object models do we want to be able to represent in SGML/XML?

An answer that says "whatever SGML/XML can represent as it is currently
defined" doesn't help me here.  I care about what we intend to do with
these future repositories and what it's going to take to do it.
--
Joe Lapp (Java Apps Developer/Consultant)
Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org
jlapp@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
    • From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
  • Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>
  • Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Query Languages for XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread