• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 09:40:03 -0500

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> 
> In XML-Link, does XML content that is included by EMBED in a valid document
> have to go through validation like the other parts of the document?  

No. Validation is defined for XML documents. XML Link is a completely
different spec and has no bearing on the definition of an XML document.
You seem to rather be thinking of the XML "hyperdocument" (in hytime
terms).

> Is
> EMBEDded content considered part of the document for styling purposes, grove
> manipulation, etc.?  

XML has no style language yet and also has no definition of a grove. So
the answer is "nobody knows yet."

> Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer (January) / Cookies (February)

Do you really have an XML book coming out in January? What spec will it
be based upon?

 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • EMBED and validation
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ]]> within a CDATA marked section ?
• Next by Date: Re: XML and standards (was Re: Integrity in the Hands of the Client)
• Previous by thread: Re: EMBED and validation
• Next by thread: RE: EMBED and validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread