• From: Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@m...>
• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:06:12 -0500

At 12:53 PM 11/21/97 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>
>
>> From: Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@m...>
>
>> The following properties of object models are easily represented in SGML/XML:
>> 
>> o       Identity
>> o       State
>> o       Type
>> 
>> These properties are not easily represented:
>> 
>> o       Behavior (except for in languages that allow methods to be
>> represented as data, e.g. Java)
>> o       Encapsulation constraints
>
>I think you miss what is perhaps *THE* most important thing that SGML content
>models represent:  sequence.
>
>This is one of the essential distinguishing features of SGML.
 
The purpose of my message was to describe what SGML/XML-based interfaces to
object systems can represent, not to propose that SGML/XML should have the
same inheritance mechanisms as object oriented systems. Whether or not they
should, I think it is pretty clear that they don't.

Jonathan


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Previous by thread: Inheritance (was: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas)
• Next by thread: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread