• From: Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@m...>
• To: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 14:35:21 -0500

At 02:28 PM 11/20/97 -0500, Joe Lapp wrote:
>Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@m...> wrote:
>>These properties are not easily represented:
>>
>>o       Behavior (except for in languages that allow methods to be
>>represented as data, e.g. Java)
>>o       Encapsulation constraints
>
>I'm not sure what you mean by "encapsulation constraints."  OMT uses
>a variety of constraints, but none go by that name.  Pouring over the
>UML documentation I only see the term "constraint" being used in a
>general way.
 
I'm thinking of public/protected/private access in languages like C++, i.e.
the constraints on access to encapsulated data.

Jonathan


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: Access Languages are Tied to Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread