• From: Chris Lovett <clovett@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 18:24:05 -0800

> At 07:03 PM 04/11/97 +0700, James Clark wrote:
> >If all you want to do is be able to
> >correctly parse well-formed XML, and you don't care about detecting
> >whether or not it is well-formed, how much code does it take and is it
> >significantly faster than using an XML parser ...
> >Lark: 10.5 seconds .. MSXML: 24 .. nsgmlsu: 8 .. sgcount:11 .. 
> >xmlec (C): 0.5 seconds .. (Java): 1.5 seconds.
> 
[Chris Lovett]  Tree building is a killer for large documents because of the
heap activity.  Initial experiments that stub out tree building in MSXML
show about a 100% improvement on my machine.  

>  

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: conflicting answers
• Next by Date: attribute defaults
• Previous by thread: Re: XML processing experiments
• Next by thread: Re: XML processing experiments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread