• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 16:16:29 -0500

W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
> Or said another way, you don't need a standard for the control language
> (although it's useful to have one) if you have a standard for the data
> model to be controlled.

I would think that there are major optimization benefits to having a
standard query language. Each database vendor can take a complete query
describing  a node and choose the quickest way to find the node, vs.
passively waiting for each query component (e.g. get this
node-list....now reverse it...now find the first node of type
element....now check its GI etc. etc.).

 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Query Languages for XML
    • From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Query Languages for XML
• Next by Date: ot.xml
• Previous by thread: Re: Query Languages for XML
• Next by thread: Data manipulation languages for XML (was Query Languages ...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread