Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ingo Macherius wrote: > > In preparation of a talk I wondered if there already is a name for an > XML compatible HTML. HTML 4.0 surely is not syntactically compatible > to XML productions, but I would wonder if there isn't work underway. > Is it simply HTML 5.0, or HTML-XML ? > -- As I've been developing an XML DTD to provide the functionality of HTML 4.0 (now horrendously late - sigh) I've been using the working title of HTML-XML, just as you suggest above. I don't think it's the W3C's intention to replace HTML with XML, and I certainly would be surprised if they made the HTML 5.0 (or even 4.0) DTD from XML. Although, come to think of it, there probably wouldn't be a huge difference in the two DTDs, in terms of what they can do. I vote for HTML-XML. It's faster than saying "an XML DTD to provide the functionality of HTML 4.0." --->Ben Trafford xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
