• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 15:00:40 -0400

Bruce T. Smith wrote:
> I think Len's reaction is a bit extreme. I may debug in ASCII with line
> numbers, but I don't edit with ed or EDLIN. If I wanted to hack lots of
> HTML or SGML or VRML with a text editor, I'd choose emacs or some other
> editor that was aware of syntactic structures.

Sure, but Emacs does not hide verbosity. The complaint with XML-DATA is
primarily verbosity. All of the XML syntax buries the information. The
more dense the information you are working with, the smaller you want
your delimiters. XML tags are <LOOOOONG>, <VERBOSE> delimiters.
 
 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@c...>
  • Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
    • From: "Bruce T. Smith" <smith@A...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Next by Date: Re: AFs and the DPH
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Next by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread