Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
akirkpatrick@i... wrote: > How do we stop the authors actually using <inline> and <block> which > have little meaning as they are? Do we need a "pure virtual" syntax > which indicates that an element type cannot be instantiated in the > instance? Yes, in my essay I introduce a <!CLASS ...> declaration ro abstract supertypes. > Either way, I like this idea a lot. Does the instance syntax proposal for > XML take any of this into account? If so, I might be converted, on the > assumption that this type of thing won't make it into the SGML revision. Well I think that something inheritance-like is going into the revision. We just have to push for it to be straightforward and "first-class" rather than indirected as archforms are. Paul Prescod xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
