• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "Sean Mc Grath" <digitome@i...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 19:29:12 +1000

 
> From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
 
> [Rick Jelliffe]
> > 
> >But the proposed syntax in XML-data has a different and extended
> >functionality compared to XML's declaration syntax.  So rather than having
> >two (notional) simple parsers, you have a single parser that is more
> >complicated.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand this. Why is the parser more complicated?
 
I am assuming that the XML-data parser makes use of the things declared in
some way. So it is more complicated than just a simple XML instance parser
that only looks at well-formedness. 


Rick Jelliffe

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Next by Date: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Next by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread