• From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 1 Oct 97 15:49:47 BST

Michael said:
>  ><!ENTITY % animal-friends-content 
>  >	" ( pet | cat | dog %extra-animal-friends-content )* "
>  >
>  >so that you could do
>  >
>  ><!ENTITY % extra-animal-friends-content '| stick-insect'>
>  >
>  >[Note this is not valid XML, I don't think]
>  
>  I believe it is valid XML, at least according to the spec of early
>  August.  The internal subset cannot have parameter entity references,
>  but there's no rule against parameter entity declarations in the
>  internal subset.

Michael is absolutely correct -- I was confusing ENTITY definitions
with CONTENT model definitions.  One of the non-obvious consequences
of the current (8879-inherited) situation is that the above is OK, but
the following isn't:

<!ELEMENT animal-friends ( pet | cat | dog %extra-animal-friends-content )*>

ht

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?
• Next by Date: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?
• Next by thread: RE: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread