• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "Paul Prescod" <papresco@t...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:02:56 +1000

 
> From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
 
> The relevant question is *which syntax is better*? I think that from a
> reader's and writer's point of view, the current DTD syntax is better.
> It is more readable and compact. From a *programmers* point of view, the
> new syntax is better because it allows you to reduce the number of
> parsers in your system.
 
But the proposed syntax in XML-data has a different and extended
functionality compared to XML's declaration syntax.  So rather than having
two (notional) simple parsers, you have a single parser that is more
complicated.

Btw, in XML-data can the element type-declarations be subtyped just
like other element types, or are they treated as special?
  
Rick Jelliffe

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: AFs and the DPH
• Next by Date: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Next by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax? (and some wishes)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread