• From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:27:49 -0400

[Paul Madsen:]

> Do not Architectural forms provide the traditional DTD syntax just that
> ability [to extend object types so that one class of object is a
> specialization of another more general class]?

[Michael Leventhal:]

> So say some but not really.

I'm one of those who say so.  How "not really"?

-Steve

--
             Steven R. Newcomb   President
         voice +1 716 271 0796   TechnoTeacher, Inc.
           fax +1 716 271 0129   (courier: 23-2 Clover Park,
      Internet: srn@t...    Rochester NY 14618)
           FTP: ftp.techno.com   P.O. Box 23795
    WWW: http://www.techno.com   Rochester, NY 14692-3795 USA


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?
    • From: Michael Leventhal <michael@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Animal-friends implemented as a pattern (Re: XML-Data:advantages over DTD syntax?)
• Next by Date: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?
• Next by thread: Re: XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread