• From: Terry Allen <tallen@s...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 16:48:32 -0700

"Match" is defined in the Terminology section, 1.3, contrary to what
I wrote.  "A string matches a grammatical production if it
belongs to the language generated by that production."  So if
"the l g by that p" means that you expand all the tokens it
contains, and an XML document is a string, then WFness applies
to the internals of prolog.  Perhaps a clause here to deal
specifically with documents would be a good idea.

Regards,

  Terry Allen    Electronic Publishing Consultant    tallen[at]sonic.net
                   http://www.sonic.net/~tallen/
    Davenport and DocBook:  http://www.ora.com/davenport/index.html
          T.A. at Passage Systems:  terry.allen[at]passage.com 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Re WF, V, and MSXML
• Next by Date: Re WF, V, and MSXML
• Previous by thread: Re WF, V, and MSXML
• Next by thread: RE: WF, V, and MSXML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread