• From: Peter@u... (Peter Murray-Rust)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 22:46:56 GMT

In message <01BC5CA9.129BCC80@y...> Boris Moore writes:
> On Sunday, 4 May 1997, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> 
> >>I would like to re-use *existing* browser functionality rather
> >>than continuing to extend the *generic* aspects of a browser in JUMBO.
> >>I'm interested in exploring the general question of how a specialist
> >>Java application interacts with a Java-enabled HTML browser.
> 
> I cannot reply to the Java and JavaScript aspects of your questions, but 
> I am struck by how closely your description of hoped for interaction 
> between Jumbo and the built-in HTML rendering of the browser relates to 
> work we at RivCom have doing on developing a Netscape Plug-in for XML.

Don't worry about the language aspect - a C++ plugin sounds a very useful 
way forward.  The main disadvantage is that it is platform-specific, but of 
course its performance is better.  Java is probably a better way to develop
methods over the WWW.

	P.

-- 
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences
http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: DOCTYPE misunderstood
• Next by Date: Re: DOCTYPE misunderstood
• Previous by thread: RE: XML and HTML browsers
• Next by thread: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread