• From: David Megginson <dmeggins@u...>
• To: <geirog@f...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 06:56:55 -0400

geirog@f... writes:

 > >By the way, you gain nothing by using "+" instead of "*", since
 > >#PCDATA can be an empty string.  
 > 
 > I know, but why isn't it allowed at all? (or why was it allowed in SGML in
 > the first place?)

Because full SGML treats all content models equally, while XML
attaches special restrictions to those with mixed content.  Full SGML
also allows relatively useless expressions like

  (#PCDATA & foo)*
  (#PCDATA)+

and it will let you do many other strange things, as long as your
content model does not become ambiguous.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117@f...
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins@m...
University of Ottawa            dmeggins@u...
        http://www.uottawa.ca/~dmeggins

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • XML and repeatable model groups
    • From: <geirog@f...>
  • XML and repeatable model groups
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggins@u...>
  • Re: #PCDATA in model group that is not optional and repeatable (was: XML and repeatable model groups)
    • From: <geirog@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: #PCDATA in model group that is not optional and repeatable (was: XML and repeatable model groups)
• Next by Date: Re: What are XML's namespaces?
• Previous by thread: Re: #PCDATA in model group that is not optional and repeatable (was: XML and repeatable model groups)
• Next by thread: small questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread