[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • To: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@a...>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 13:10:39 -0600

Eve L. Maler wrote:
> 
> I've also been beating the drum on the WG list about how our PIs should
> have "GIs" as well as "attribute specs," so I'd prefer to see <?XML
> stylesheet att1="val1" att2="val2"... ?>.  This way, "<?XML" targets the PI
> so that it will be processed by an XML-aware processor, and the rest
> identifies the semantics of the instruction.

This looks weirdly like DTD/instance built into the XML instance.
So, XML then defines an application inside the instance?

I understand it because this is how IADS and IDE/AS did links 
originally.  However, it created interoperability problems 
and does to this day.  What is the difference between this 
and a tag bag of empty elements included at the top of a DTD?

len

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member