Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>>>So if we are going to use a catalog entry (and I'm not yet convinced >>>this is the best solution) I would suggest having a simple DSSSL entry >>>which looks like: >>> >>>DSSSL spec.dsl >> >>The problem with this is that it is application specific. How do I >>tell a browser that DSSSL === DSSSL Stylesheet? > >I don't see your point at all. Why do you need to tell the browser? The >browser knows that the DSSSL keyword in the catalog designates a DSSSL >specification (it could include transformation specs as well as stylesheets) >the same way it knows that the SGMLDECL entry designates an SGML >specification, and the same way it would know that a type of >dsssl-specification in a SEMANTICS entry My point is that you are proposing adding an extension that is not standardised or generalised. Given that we all agree that a DSSSL keyword should be supported, there isn't much of a problem, though I would prefer adding some descriptive label to it. SEMANTICS is a more general solution: you could use it for CSS or whatever else you wanted/supported. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@i...)
|
